View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 h | 2-4 h | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-5 | 3-8 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |