View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Product Discovery Smoke Test |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 45-90 min | 1-5 Tage | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-12 | Nutzertraffic | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | ChangeDecisionStrategy | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |