methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration of the Lotus Blossom working structure.
Innovation
Lotus Blossom
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage60-120 min45-90 min2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
4-122-83-103-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsLotus Diagram, Idea Themes, ShortlistFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
Add more methods