methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage60-120 min1-2 Tage15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
4-122-81-41-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods