View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Domain Modeling Context Map |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 h | 30-60 min | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |