methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage2-4 h2-6 h45-120 min
Participantsdifferent
4-122-83-82-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanCompetency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasChange Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action List
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
Add more methods