View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Architecture C4 Model |  Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 1-4 h | 2-6 h | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-5 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas |