methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Incident Timeline Analysis.
DevOps
Incident Timeline Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
For an incident with an unclear sequence, the method makes the timeline precisely visible. It separates perception, reaction, and delay so cause and effect become more clearly readable.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
60-180 min10-20 min daily30-60 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1013-123-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Incident Timeline, Evidence Log, Delay Analysis, Improvement ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
IncidentTimelineSite Reliability Engineering
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods