methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Incident Command workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Incident Command
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
As needed1-3 h1-2 h60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
4-151-82-84-20
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Incident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder UpdatesArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
IncidentOperationsReliability
SensemakingDecisionRationale
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods