methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration for Theory of Change
Systems Thinking
Theory of Change
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.Theory of Change translates a desired impact into a traceable chain of change. It makes assumptions, intermediate goals, and measurement points visible before a program is rolled out at scale.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighHighMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min0.5-3 Tage2-6 hWochen bis Monate je Goal
Participantsdifferent
3-85-154-123-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsRich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaTheory of Change Map, Assumptions, Outcome MeasuresGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
ImpactOutcomesSystems thinkingStrategy
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
Add more methods