methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min0.5-2 Tage10-20 min dailyWochen bis Monate je Goal
Participantsdifferent
3-84-1213-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsScenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports
Tags1 shared
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
Add more methods