methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-4 h1-3 h15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-83-82-82-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods