View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 15-45 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 1-3 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | RAID Log, Status Report Source | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |