methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration for Affinity Estimation.
Agile
Affinity Estimation
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-5 min je ItemWochen bis Monate je Goal30-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-83-93-103-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split CandidatesGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsAffinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
EstimationBacklogRelative sizing
Add more methods