methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Theory of Change
Systems Thinking
Theory of Change
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.Theory of Change translates a desired impact into a traceable chain of change. It makes assumptions, intermediate goals, and measurement points visible before a program is rolled out at scale.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 minWochen bis Monate je Goal2-4 h2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-83-103-84-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved InjectionsTheory of Change Map, Assumptions, Outcome Measures
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
ImpactOutcomesSystems thinkingStrategy
Add more methods