methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 minHalf day1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
3-83-123-126-30 Experten
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesLeverage Map, Action StrategyExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes
Tags1 shared
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
Add more methods