View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping | ![]() UX Research Contextual Inquiry | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method | ![]() Operations Getting Things Done |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-3 Wochen | 10-20 min daily | 1-2 h Setup, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 1 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | UX researchObservationContext | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution |



