View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Architecture C4 Model |  Decision Making Decision Tree |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-4 h | 30-90 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-5 | 1-6 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | DecisionTreeOptions | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |