methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-60 min1-2 hWochen bis Monate je Goal
Participantsdifferent
3-82-84-123-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk rankingAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
Add more methods