methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 minWochen bis Monate je Goal10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
3-82-53-101
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods