methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min60-90 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
3-82-54-101
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods