methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Paper illustration for Story Points.
Agile
Story Points
Paper illustration for Bucket System.
Agile
Bucket System
Purposedifferent
When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data.When a large batch of work needs a fast, rough estimate, it sorts items into predefined size buckets. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, and Split Candidates.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
15-60 min2-5 min je Itemlaufend, 1-5 min je Item30-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-93-93-93-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split CandidatesPoint Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity DataBucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, Split Candidates
Tags1 shared
EstimationEffortAgile
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
EstimationAgileMeasurement
EstimationBacklogRelative sizing
Add more methods