methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-60 min1 h bis mehrere Wochen1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-91-8NutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsPDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangeInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
EstimationEffortAgile
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods