View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Ideal Days |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 15-60 min | 1-3 h | 15-45 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-9 | 2-8 | 1-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortAgile | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning |