View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Ideal Days | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-60 min | 1-2 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-9 | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortAgile | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |



