methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Iceberg Model method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Iceberg Model
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min1-2 Tage2-6 h15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
2-101-43-81-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention IdeasArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods