methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of ICE Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
ICE Scoring
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Architecture Communication Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Communication Canvas
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Purposedifferent
When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min30-90 min60-120 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-81-62-81-5
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ICE Table, Top Idea ListDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListCommunication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication PlanContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram
Tagsno overlap
PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision
DecisionTreeOptions
ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Add more methods