View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | Half day | 1-3 h | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 1-8 | 5-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Spotify Model Map, Action List |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | SensemakingDecisionRationale | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis |