methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
A paper-based illustration representing Design Sprint with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Design Sprint
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h3-14 Tage30-60 min je Interview4-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-850+5-10 Interviews5-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesPrototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
QuantitativeResearchValidation
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation
Add more methods