methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h30-60 min30-60 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-122-103-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods