methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration of Specification by Example with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Specification by Example
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration of Acceptance Criteria Workshop with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Acceptance Criteria Workshop
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h60-90 min pro Feature30-90 min20-40 min pro Story
Participantsdifferent
2-83-61-63-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesExample Table, Acceptance TestsDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListAcceptance Criteria, Story Update
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development
DecisionTreeOptions
AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development
Add more methods