methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-4 h60-90 min15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-84-121-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action BacklogADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
RiskDecisionSensemaking
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods