methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h45-90 min45–75 min15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-12Team members involved1-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
DecisionRolesGovernance
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods