View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction | ![]() Facilitation Decision Jam | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 10-20 min je Frage | 60-90 min | 20-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 6-50 | 4-10 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | LearningDialogueFacilitation | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding |



