View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Knowledge Modeling Domain Storytelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | Domain Storytelling translates domain knowledge into a shared narrative of actors, objects, and workflows. It is especially useful when language, rules, and process understanding must be tightly connected. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 30-120 min | 1-3 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-6 | 1-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Domain Story, Glossary Notes, Process Narrative |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | LeanObservationProcessOperations | SensemakingDecisionRationale | KnowledgeDomain-Driven DesignProcess |