methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of ICE Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
ICE Scoring
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h30-60 min1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-81-52-81-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesICE Table, Top Idea ListExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods