methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h30-90 min1-5 Tage45-75 min
Participantsdifferent
2-81-6Nutzertraffic2-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteTest Matrix, Test Plan
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
DecisionTreeOptions
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
Add more methods