methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h1-5 Tage60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-85-30Nutzertraffic4-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
Add more methods