methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of Spotify Model Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Spotify Model Mapping
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-45 min90-180 min90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
2-81-35-154-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesADR File, Decision Log, RationaleSpotify Model Map, Action ListDecision Rights Matrix, Agreement
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
Add more methods