methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-45 min45-90 min1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-81-33-121-4
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesADR File, Decision Log, RationaleForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ChangeDecisionStrategy
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Add more methods