View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping | ![]() Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 20-40 min pro Story | 1-2 h | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-6 | 1-8 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |



