View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas |  Product Discovery Test Card |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 20-35 min | 5-15 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-5 | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |