Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas Power Interest Grid Stakeholder Salience Model Alignment Mapping

Criterion	Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas	Facilitation Power Interest Grid	Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model	Facilitation Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent	When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog.	When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy.	When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.	When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Low	Medium	Medium
Timedifferent	60-90 min	30-60 min	60-90 min	1-2 h
Participantsdifferent	3-8	2-8	3-6	4-12
Formatsame	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog	Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder	Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class	Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap	ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance	AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation

Add more methods