View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation How Might We | ![]() Team Design Team API | ![]() Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes | ![]() UX Design Design Studio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | Half day | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Team API Document | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | SketchingCollaborationIdeation |



