View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation How Might We |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  UX Research User Interviews |  Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 30–60 min per interview | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 5-12 Interviews | 1 participant per interview | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |