methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
How Might We
Innovation
How Might We
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Purposedifferent
With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction.CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
30–45 min45-90 min20-40 min initial, dann laufend30 min Setup, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-103-83-151-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea PromptsCATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsROAM Board, Owner ListRAID Log, Status Report Source
Tagsno overlap
FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
Add more methods