methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
How Might We
Innovation
How Might We
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Purposedifferent
With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction.CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
30–45 min45-90 min45-90 min30-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-103-83-122-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea PromptsCATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsRich Picture, Problem Framing Notes
Tagsno overlap
FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
Add more methods