methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
How Might We
Innovation
How Might We
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Purposedifferent
With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30–45 min1-4 h15-45 min30-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-101-51-32-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea PromptsContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramADR File, Decision Log, RationaleRich Picture, Problem Framing Notes
Tagsno overlap
FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
Add more methods