methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
How Might We
Innovation
How Might We
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Purposedifferent
With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
30–45 min15-45 min90-180 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-101-34-123-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea PromptsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleDecision Rights Matrix, AgreementInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
Add more methods