methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Multiple workshops over several weeks5-15 min60-120 min60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-203-85-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Hooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics checkRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistFlywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment BacklogRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
GrowthBehaviorRetention
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
GrowthRetentionConversion
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods